1.
Adam
Over
most of the last decade, I have grown to dislike Alexander. He is a
paranoid alcoholic. His murders include 8,000 men that were defending
the city of Cyropolis, and many other people. He burned the city of Persepolis to the ground without reason- and more recently, he has been forcing us to march for almost
ten years.
Today,
I’d like to share (with whoever reads this) an excerpt from my
diary. Note: at this point, I had only been in Alexander’s forces
for a small amount of time.
“Many times before he has seemingly sentenced us to death by ordering us to attack a much larger enemy. Today was no exception. Remember that this May of 334 BC, we crushed a part of the Persian cavalry that had four men for every one of us. He may be crazy, what with keeping us away from home this long, but he sure knows what he is doing.”
That
was around seven years ago. It is 327 BC. My opinions of him have
changed much since then. I have been marching and fighting for every
moment. I still do not doubt his expertise in the ways of his
military, but I have lost most of my hope in his sanity. I am
mentally and physically exhausted, and I long to return home. He must
be as well, but if he had it his way, he would try to conquer
everything there is to the east, no matter the circumstances.
Maybe
I would not be so bitter if I did not hold him responsible for the
death of my most trusted companion, Samuel.
We
recently defeated King Porus’ army of men who sat on elephants-
that was peculiar. Afterwards, the other men and I put our heads
together and discovered that we had marched 11,000 miles. We finally
convinced him to turn back. Maybe that was not the smartest plan, for
now he is leading us across a desert. There is little food or water.
My lips are cracked and bleeding, and I often feel faint. I do not
know if I will survive much longer. I think we are headed towards
Susa.
Samuel
was a funny guy from the beginning. I knew I liked him the first time
he whispered a joke in my ear during an ‘inspirational’ speech of
Alexander’s. Samuel claimed that Alexander was a... a homosexual. I
never saw proof of such myself, but Sam was not the only person I
heard this from.
Samuel
dropped dead not two hours ago- and I had to keep walking. There were
no goodbyes. Worse- he was not nearly the only one. Curse this desert.
I
work alongside others who have shared their own tales and told more
of his atrocities. Many share that he is a paranoid alcoholic. I do not doubt that. Once, after he had been drinking, he ordered us to burn the Persian capital, Persepolis, to the ground. In addition, we have all
seen him rage and kill innocent people in large numbers. For example, last year, in 328 BC, he ordered
us to kill 8,000 men outright that were defending the revolting
Persian city of Cyropolis. During the capture of Gaza in 332 B.C., around 10,000 people in the city were killed. Afterwards, Alexander showed an outburst of fury and tortured the city's governor. It seems this man has plenty of evil in
his barely five-foot stature.
I
suppose I understand the reason he is referred to as ‘the Great’.
Most call Alexander this because he has conquered almost all
of the world he knows, and he is barely thirty. He has persistence
and the ability to carry through with tough decisions. Alexander has
worked at expanding his empire since even before his father was
murdered in 336 BC. Up until now, he has never given up on achieving
what he wanted. However, his greatness came with a cost. There have
been many unnecessary deaths under his rule. Many soldiers died for
stupid reasons. He may be Great, but he has questionable morals.
-Adam
2. Helen
Dear
Journal,
I,
Helen, have no doubt that the spread of Hellenistic culture has done
nothing but aid Alexander's empire. This I know, because my husband
and I have been a resident of the city Alexandria in Egypt since 331
B.C., practically since it was founded. Alexandria is a reflection of
the growth in culture, art, science, and trade that all Alexander's
empire has experienced. It is all because of the spread of Hellenism-
that is what Jimmy says. Culture has blossomed, education all
throughout the land has flourished, architecture is more beautiful
than ever, and philosophical debates are popular because of this mix
of Greek, Persian, Indian, and Egyptian culture.
Jimmy
tells me that the empire is more educated because of this great
increase of literature. Have you seen Alexandria's library? I would
say it is the finest in the world. The library in Pergamum is a close
second. If I had time, I would visit them both every day. My
favorites in our library are the works of Lucian- I eat up a good
romance. There is plenty of poetry to read, as well.
My
favorite sculpture- I have been to see it many times- is the Venus of
Milo. It is a bust of a very beautiful woman, the kind with no arms.
Jimmy told me once that it is not as beautiful as me. I do not
believe him. One just as famous is the Dying Gaul. Jimmy likes that
one the best. We are lucky that both of these impressive sculptures
are right here in Alexandria.
My
friends and I sometimes participate in philosophical disputation. It
is very popular among the educated currently, so of course that
includes us. I especially love these conversations with my dear
companion Dorsey. It entertains me that we may be discussing thoughts
that not one soul has thought before. However, ours are likely rather
dull compared to the Stoics and to the Epicureans. I can see the truth in both of their philosophies, but I do not know exactly what I believe.
I
might add that this spread of culture has also brought a great deal
of money towards me and my husband. Jimmy is a very talented
merchant, and now that navigators have learned more about the
surrounding waters, he gets much more business trading all
around the world. It helps that with Hellenism people in the
empire mostly share a language. Koine is becoming quite popular.
I
owe my thanks to Alexander, even if he has not always made the best decisions. This great culture is a part of my daily
life because of this vast empire he created that extends all the way
to India.
-Helen
3. Comparison of Rosa Parks to Alexander the Great
Both
Rosa Parks and Alexander the Great have, at one time, carried the
idea of being great. The difference between these two historical
figures is whether they are considered great to this day. While
Alexander was once thought of as a fearless Macedonian leader who
conquered Greece, Persia, Egypt, and part of India in his very short
rule, today's historians have studied the evidence and have
determined that Alexander was not morally just or mentally sound. He
was an angry man who had problems with alcohol, displayed murderous
tendencies, and at least once showed signs of being a necrophiliac.
On the other hand, Rosa Parks is now considered to be a great African
American pioneer of civil rights, while she once was thought of as
being an insubordinate troublemaker.
At
the very beginning of the American Civil Rights movement in 1955, Rosa Parks refused
to move from her seat in the front of a bus and give it to a white
person. She was arrested and fined. Though this seems appalling from a modern perspective, Rosa Parks was the one in the wrong to many white people at that time. She eventually received the respect and recognition she deserved for being the spark to the movement that ended segregation in America.
Alexander did many things that could prove his atrocity. Simply one example is when he drunkenly ordered the burning Persian capital, Persepolis, to the ground.
Rosa Parks is great person with extreme integrity, even if she was not always considered to be so. It is Alexander, with "Great" a part of his name, that is not truly great. He was vicious and evil, while Parks was brave and admirable.
Alexander did many things that could prove his atrocity. Simply one example is when he drunkenly ordered the burning Persian capital, Persepolis, to the ground.
Rosa Parks is great person with extreme integrity, even if she was not always considered to be so. It is Alexander, with "Great" a part of his name, that is not truly great. He was vicious and evil, while Parks was brave and admirable.
Sources:
"Alexander
the Great." Britannica School High.
Encyclopedia Britannica, 2013.
Web.
19 Sept. 2013. <http://school.eb.com/levels/high/article/
272799>.
Boardman,
John, Jasper Griffin, and Oswyn Murray. "Introduction: The World
after Alexander." The Oxford History of the Classical
World. Oxford [Oxfordshire: Oxford UP, 1986. N. pag. Print.
Search.
Weider History Group, 22 Mar. 2007. Web. 19 Sept. 2013.
<http://go.galegroup.com/ps/
retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=DA-SORT&inPS=true&prodId=GPS&userGroupName=a
vlr&tabID=T003&searchId=R1&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&contentSegment=&searchType=
BasicSearchForm¤tPosition=1&contentSet=GALE%7CA333618542&&docId=GALE|A33361
8542&docType=GALE&role=ITOF>.
Ansari,
Prof Ali. "Alexander the Not so Great: History through Persian
Eyes." BBC
News.
BBC, 14 July 2012. Web. 25 Sept. 2013.
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18803290>.
"Hellenistic
Civilization." Infoplease.
Columbia University Press, n.d. Web. 23 Sept. 2013.
<http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/entertainment/hellenistic-civilization.html>.
Beck,
Roger B., et al. World
History: Patterns of Interaction. United
States of America, 2007. Print.
"Rosa
Parks Biography." Academy
of Achievement.
N.p., 9 Apr. 2012. Web. 25 Sept. 2013.
<http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/par0bio-1>.
i like how you flip-flopped the thought of greatness of the two people. it was interesting how some people start out as great then fall, then some people start out as a disgrace and become great. good comparison on Rosa Parks!
ReplyDeleteI loved how you compared Rosa Parks and Alexander in a different way than most people did. The way you talked about what made Rosa Parks great was different than why Alexander was considered great. Iv'e never thought of the different types of ways you can be known as great and this was a perfect example.
ReplyDeleteI like how you incorporated Rosa Parks as being great, I think she is a great example of showing true greatness and bravery. The comparison between the two is great, I like how you made the difference between Alexander the Great and Rosa Parks.
ReplyDeleteI love your first entry! The detail and personal story proved that you put a lot thought into your work. The information used in the entire blog post was proof proving every point you made out to prove. There wasn't anyway for me to disagree with your opinion on Alexander. You comparison to Rosa Parks was a wonderful way to further prove your point. Even though you showed Rosa Parks as a person known for being "Great" later and for being a better person you still tied to overall explanation to Alexander. Great work!
ReplyDeletei really liked this one. i hadn't even considered Rosa Parks for this assignment. that was a very good way to compare someone who lived a very long time ago to someone more recent.
ReplyDelete